AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Findings8/30/2023 ![]() It’s like a social science pharmaceutical trial. A control group that received no voucher.Įconomists love random assignment, because it helps overcome one of the biggest problems in social science: isolating causation from correlation.A Section-8 group that received a voucher but no restriction on movement.An experimental group that received a rental subsidy (voucher) but had to move to a low-poverty neighborhood for at least one year.In a handful of large cities, a few thousand public-housing residents were randomly assigned to one of three programs: MTO was started in 1994 by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The second study of roughly 13,000 children is smaller but packs a big policy punch, since it directly contradicts recent evaluations of a major policy initiative - Moving to Opportunity (MTO) - carried out by leading social scientists. Two major new studies from Harvard economists Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren show that neighborhoods matter not only for daily life, but for the life chances of the children raised there.ĭrawing on a unique data set based on the tax records of 44 million households, the first study shows that locality matters a great deal for the future income of children. ![]() ![]() Crime and fear of crime are experienced locally, as is the police response to it.īut wide income gaps and America’s legacy of racial segregation result in wide differences between neighborhoods on a range of measures. They play together in parks and homes, not over Skype. Children do not stream lectures - they go to school. Neighborhoods remain the crucible of social life, even in the internet age.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |